Welcome to Liberty Just in Case

Glad you stopped by. Take a look around, and let me know what you think, either through a comment or by email.

Tuesday, March 23, 2010

Finally, Something I Can Agree With Joe Biden On

Only Joe Biden could stand in front of a nationwide audience, the dream of a hundred years worth of Progressive vision about to be realized, and believe he wouldn't be overheard as he introduced the President.


He's right though. Obamacare is a "big f***ing deal." David Brooks puts it in perspective,with no cursing, a talent Joe Biden seems to be sadly lacking.


Yet I confess, watching all this, I feel again why I’m no longer spiritually attached to the Democratic Party. The essence of America is energy — the vibrancy of the market, the mobility of the people and the disruptive creativity of the entrepreneurs. This vibrancy grew up accidentally, out of a cocktail of religious fervor and material abundance, but it was nurtured by choice. It was nurtured by our founders, who created national capital markets to disrupt the ossifying grip of the agricultural landholders. It was nurtured by 19th-century Republicans who built the railroads and the land-grant colleges to weave free markets across great distances. It was nurtured by Progressives who broke the stultifying grip of the trusts.
Today, America’s vigor is challenged on two fronts. First, the country is becoming geriatric. Other nations spend 10 percent or so of their G.D.P. on health care. We spend 17 percent and are predicted to soon spend 20 percent and then 25 percent. This legislation was supposed to end that asphyxiating growth, which will crowd out investments in innovation, education and everything else. It will not.
With the word security engraved on its heart, the Democratic Party is just not structured to cut spending that would enhance health and safety. The party nurtures; it does not say, “No more.”
C.S. Lewis said it best.
Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.
It is a tyranny that smothers, all in the name of the common good, all in the name of saving it's victims from pain.

Mr. Brooks continues:

The second biggest threat to America’s vibrancy is the exploding federal debt. Again, Democrats can utter the words of fiscal restraint, but they don’t feel the passion. This bill is full of gimmicks designed to get a good score from the Congressional Budget Office but not to really balance the budget. Democrats did enough to solve their political problem (not looking fiscally reckless) but not enough to solve the genuine problem.
Nobody knows how this bill will work out. It is an undertaking exponentially more complex than the Iraq war, for example. But to me, it feels like the end of something, not the beginning of something. It feels like the noble completion of the great liberal project to build a comprehensive welfare system.
Perhaps Joe Biden was correct. His use of expletives, gutter language, seems somehow far more appropriate to this undertaking. It is most assuredly not noble, but it is a f**king big deal."

Monday, March 22, 2010

Could the IPad be the new Mac? Could it kill the old Mac?

(Hat tip to Louis Gray for this one)

At first, I agreed with Louis that PCWorld must be off it's medications.

But the more I thought about it, the more I came to see the logic:


The Mac's greatest enemy may not be Microsoft Windows. It may beApple itself. In a conversation at a Goldman Sachs technologyconference, Apple COO Tim Cook said that Apple is a "mobile devices company," and that more devices will get the iPhone OS. A bit later, AT&T's CEO said the iPad would mostly be a Wi-Fi (read: home) product rather than something you tote around and use on the street.
This jibes with something I've been thinking about Apple: if it could do the Mac all over again, it would use the iPhone OS. Don't think of the iPad as a big iPod touch. Think of it, rather, as the new Mac—a new mode of home-based computing that Apple hopes will bubble up through its product line.
If the touchscreen keyboard is as easy to use as it looks. If it has an easy to use Office Suite, like IWork. Well, Hmmmm. But then there's this:
This means no independent software stores, fewer open-source projects, and perhaps a blanket ban on BitTorrent, Flash, and Firefox. It means a much more restricted peripheral market. The Mac will no longer be a PC as we know it—it will be an "end-to-end experience" like the iPhone.
Bleggghhhh! Now there would be a deal-killer. One of the few things I miss from my old PC days is the Open Source Software availability. I have HATED the closed market of using the Mac. I knew it when I got the IMac and my beloved Mac-mini. But I sure haven't liked it.
I could have written this last part myself:
Maybe it's just that I was raised on 1980s personal computers, or that I took too many American civics classes in school. But I feel that absolute power tends to corrupt, and having a single gatekeeper with no checks or balances is almost never a good thing. Obviously, the iPhone ecosystem has flourished under Apple's benign dictatorship. But the whole ecosystem is reliant on that dictatorship remaining benign. (And even now people who enjoy BitTorrent would argue that it isn't benign at all.)
As someone who's owned a Mac since 1986, and as someone who likes the vibrancy and innovation that open platforms bring to the marketplace, I'll admit I'm fearful, uncertain, and doubtful. Apple has fallen in love with end-to-end experiences, and I don't want anyone other than me to have the last word on what I can install on my own home computer.
Yep. So give me my IPad, but understand that I want it to be MINE. ObamaCare will be enough of a dictatorship. I don't need one on my computer.

Morning Bell from The Heritage Foundation

Let's start here this morning. The Intolerable Acts of 2010 will not stand.

Bruised, Battered, but Resolved

I was going to write a long, eloquent diatribe tonight. But, instead, I'll just repeat my facebook status:


We, as a nation, need to take a deep breath tonight. Not so we can scream louder at each other, but so we have time to think about what we say next. I was telling a friend that I've never seen the emotions quite so raw on the political blogs as tonight. We all need to stop, and go to bed. The fight will be there tomorrow morning. Good night.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

What Stupak Received: His Thirty Pieces of Silver


I think Judas made a better deal with the Sanhedrin...

STATEMENT FROM COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR DAN PFEIFFER
Today, the President announced that he will be issuing an executive order after the passage of the health insurance reform law that will reaffirm its consistency with longstanding restrictions on the use of federal funds for abortion.
While the legislation as written maintains current law, the executive order provides additional safeguards to ensure that the status quo is upheld and enforced, and that the health care legislation’s restrictions against the public funding of abortions cannot be circumvented.
The President has said from the start that this health insurance reform should not be the forum to upset longstanding precedent. The health care legislation and this executive order are consistent with this principle.
The President is grateful for the tireless efforts of leaders on both sides of this issue to craft a consensus approach that allows the bill to move forward.
A text of the pending executive order follows:
EXECUTIVE ORDER
- - - - - - -
ENSURING ENFORCEMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ABORTION RESTRICTIONS IN THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” (approved March ¬¬__, 2010), I hereby order as follows:
Section 1. Policy.
Following the recent passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“the Act”), it is necessary to establish an adequate enforcement mechanism to ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered), consistent with a longstanding Federal statutory restriction that is commonly known as the Hyde Amendment. The purpose of this Executive Order is to establish a comprehensive, government-wide set of policies and procedures to achieve this goal and to make certain that all relevant actors—Federal officials, state officials (including insurance regulators) and health care providers—are aware of their responsibilities, new and old.
The Act maintains current Hyde Amendment restrictions governing abortion policy and extends those restrictions to the newly-created health insurance exchanges. Under the Act, longstanding Federal laws to protect conscience (such as the Church Amendment, 42 U.S.C. §300a-7, and the Weldon Amendment, Pub. L. No. 111-8, §508(d)(1) (2009)) remain intact and new protections prohibit discrimination against health care facilities and health care providers because of an unwillingness to provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions.
Numerous executive agencies have a role in ensuring that these restrictions are enforced, including the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).
Section 2. Strict Compliance with Prohibitions on Abortion Funding in Health Insurance Exchanges. The Act specifically prohibits the use of tax credits and cost-sharing reduction payments to pay for abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered) in the health insurance exchanges that will be operational in 2014. The Act also imposes strict payment and accounting requirements to ensure that Federal funds are not used for abortion services in exchange plans (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered) and requires state health insurance commissioners to ensure that exchange plan funds are segregated by insurance companies in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, OMB funds management circulars, and accounting guidance provided by the Government Accountability Office.
I hereby direct the Director of OMB and the Secretary of HHS to develop, within 180 days of the date of this Executive Order, a model set of segregation guidelines for state health insurance commissioners to use when determining whether exchange plans are complying with the Act’s segregation requirements, established in Section 1303 of the Act, for enrollees receiving Federal financial assistance. The guidelines shall also offer technical information that states should follow to conduct independent regular audits of insurance companies that participate in the health insurance exchanges. In developing these model guidelines, the Director of OMB and the Secretary of HHS shall consult with executive agencies and offices that have relevant expertise in accounting principles, including, but not limited to, the Department of the Treasury, and with the Government Accountability Office. Upon completion of those model guidelines, the Secretary of HHS should promptly initiate a rulemaking to issue regulations, which will have the force of law, to interpret the Act’s segregation requirements, and shall provide guidance to state health insurance commissioners on how to comply with the model guidelines.
Section 3. Community Health Center Program.
The Act establishes a new Community Health Center (CHC) Fund within HHS, which provides additional Federal funds for the community health center program. Existing law prohibits these centers from using federal funds to provide abortion services (except in cases of rape or incest, or when the life of the woman would be endangered), as a result of both the Hyde Amendment and longstanding regulations containing the Hyde language. Under the Act, the Hyde language shall apply to the authorization and appropriations of funds for Community Health Centers under section 10503 and all other relevant provisions. I hereby direct the Secretary of HHS to ensure that program administrators and recipients of Federal funds are aware of and comply with the limitations on abortion services imposed on CHCs by existing law. Such actions should include, but are not limited to, updating Grant Policy Statements that accompany CHC grants and issuing new interpretive rules.
Section 4. General Provisions.
(a) Nothing in this Executive Order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) authority granted by law or presidential directive to an agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This Executive Order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This Executive Order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity against the United States, its departments, agencies, entities, officers, employees or agents, or any other person.
THE WHITE HOUSE,

The GTL™ Sunday Guest Column — “A March Towards Madness” By Christopher L. Doster

A great guest post. Worth saving and reading again.

The GTL™ Sunday Guest Column — “A March Towards Madness” By Christopher L. Doster

I Can't Remember Being More Proud of a Talking Head...

Karl Rove gave a lesson in how the war must be fought on the Talking Head shows in the coming months. He didn't let 'ole Pluff-n-Stuff get by with one lie; not one false charge. No wonder President Bush called him The Architect.

The Myth of the Pro-Life Democrat: Phyllis Schlafly

I'm going to quote her remarks extensively, and without editorializing. There is no need:


"It is naive for any elected official, especially one who describes himself as 'pro-life,' to expect that a promise to issue an Executive Order that reasserts the intentions of the Hyde Amendment will be fulfilled by the most pro-abortion president to ever sit in the White House. Perhaps Mr. Stupak and his fellow pro-life Democrats forget that President Obama's first Executive Order was the repeal of the Mexico City Policy to allow for international funding of abortion."
"Not only would an Executive Order be rendered meaningless in the face of Congress passing legislation which actively provides for the massive expansion and funding of abortion services, but anyone who doubts the abortion tsunami which awaits this bill becoming law lives in a fantasy world."
"Barack Obama has lined every existing federal agency with the most dedicated pro-abortion ideologues, and we know that he will continue this pattern of pro-abortion appointments when it comes time for him to fill the over-100 bureaucracies created to administer his socialized health care program."
"Any formerly pro-life Democrat who casts a 'Yes' vote for this Senate health care bill tonight will be forever remembered as being among the deciding votes which facilitated the largest expansion of abortion services since Roe v. Wade."
"Mr. Stupak and his Democrat followers have now clarified that you cannot be pro-life and be a Democrat.  If abortion was truly their biggest issue, they wouldn't willfully align themselves with the Party of Death."
"This vote will expose the myth of the 'pro-life Democrat.'  With this single vote, the Democratic Party will divide our nation into the Party of Death and the Party of Life, and future elections will never be the same."

Stupid, stupid Stupack

I'm trying to make myself believe that the first three letters in his name are only coincidence, I really am...

Day by Day Today

032110.jpg
Day by Day. One of my favorite cartoons

Racist Teabaggers? Let's Check the Video, Shall We?

The racist slurs didn't happen. Period.
But it sure made a great story...er...fable...er...lie.

And Now For Something Completely Different: A Periodic Table of Science Bloggers

This is just plain cool. I'm not a science blogger, at least not totally. I just blog what interests me. And this most certainly does.

Stupak and Company Cave

That's it. With Stupak and gang onboard, it's over. The healthcare monstrosity is passed. You could hear the crowd outside as they got the news.

How Do We Pray For Our Nation This Night?

One of my favorite bloggers is a wonderful woman who goes by The Anchoress. This is a night our nation desperately needs anchoring. In this post, she speaks to the question: How do we pray for our nation this night:

. . .when the Bush-Gore recount battle was going on, I asked my parish priest, a very wise man who loves Christ, how to discern God’s will. I wasn’t asking so much for his opinion on the politics of the day but when I am in one of these political battles and a religious person, can I discern God’s will in the course of trying to decide whether I should write letters, call my Congressperson, or whatever?
His simple answer was “God’s will will always be for the salvation of the individual involved.”
So I try every day now to pray for the salvation of the president, all members of Congress, and the American people. I cast my cares upon the Lord.
We are in a deeper battle here, which you well know . . . I also think in the end this all has to do with the salvation of souls, including the souls of our president and these politicians who deign to rule over the rest of us. I think we who believe must hold fast to Christ, the True Center, and bring as many along with us as possible.
Yes. How perfectly right. God’s will will always be for the salvation of the individual involved. And it follows that the salvation of the individual involved will lie in that individual’s conforming him/herself to the Word and Will of God.
Individuals.

It's how God sees us. Individuals making decisions that effect other individuals.

I've been reading The Breach, a history of the Clinton Impeachment. This was another dark time in our Nation's history. In the midst of that time, one man made a heroic and painful decision.

Bob Livingston was set to be the new Speaker of the House. But he also knew that his affair of years before was being released to the media. He knew he could not govern the House under such circumstances. He took the floor on the second day of the House debate on Impeachment.

If you watched the debate on that Saturday morning, the screen was split between the House, and the U.S. bombardment of Baghdad, in order to stop Saddam from continuing his research on weapons of mass destruction.  A dramatic day, soon to be made even more riveting by Rep. Livingston's resignation, and his call on Clinton to do the same thing. He showed courage and honor, an example of bravery I hope is remembered tomorrow, as another historic House debate gets underway.
Bob Livingston's fateful speech begins around 1900.


Saturday, March 20, 2010

Tea Party Misbehavior

The MSM will work hard to make us focus on a couple of idiots yelling racial slurs. It gives them cover to ignore the thousands that showed up in Washington today.

Thousands, representing millions of us that are fighting every way we can to prevent this bill tomorrow from becoming law.


N45.gif


By the way,does that look like hundreds to you? Accurate estimates put the crowd at 30,000.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Maybe the Dems Believe Their Own Lies

I've worked with delusional clients for twenty years. Listening to Obama now makes me think he's not lying...at least now.

One of Clinton's talents was an ability to compartmentalize the truth, allowing him to temporarily believe his own lies. It requires a master liar to do that.

Obama is not a master liar of clintonian proportions. He has now fallen into one of the many traps along the path to becoming a Master Liar. He believes his own lies. He's told the story so many times that he now believes it's true.

This makes him far more dangerous than Bill Clinton. It makes Obama delusional. And while most delusional people are not dangerous, most delusional people are not leaders of the free world.

I pray there are members of his party who do not share his delusions, and can look past the lies. It's the only chance this nation has to remain free.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Charlie Brown and Lucy? Maybe

This is a great piece on why the House Dems don't trust the Senate Dems. Very innocent in it's own way.It strikes me that a better analogy is rival Mob families in on the same crime. Remember: There is no honor among thieves, especially political ones.

Lucy and Charlie Brown are shown during Christmastime.OUR GOVERNMENT

Friday, March 19, 2010

Sean Hannity and the Freedom Alliance: A Huge Story if True

A huge hat tip to Gun Toting Liberal for this bombshell.

I thought long and hard about rather to post this story. Debbie Schussel is a pretty reliable source, and it sure looks like she did her homework.

In fact, less than 20%–and in two recent years, less than 7% and 4%, respectively–of the money raised by Freedom Alliance went to these causes, while millions of dollars went to expenses, including consultants and apparently to ferry the Hannity posse of family and friends in high style. And, despite Hannity’s statements to the contrary on his nationally syndicated radio show, few of the children of fallen soldiers got more than $1,000-$2,000, with apparently none getting more than $6,000, while Freedom Alliance appears to have spent tens of thousands of dollars for private planes.  Moreover, despite written assurances to donors that all money raised would go directly to scholarships for kids of the fallen heroes and not to expenses, has begun charging expenses of nearly $500,000 to give out just over $800,000 in scholarships.
In February 2009, a well-known conservative writer sent me this, about a friend at FOX News:
The guy went on to tell me about Hannity’s “Freedom Concerts,” which are staged across the country with the proceeds going to children of slain soldiers. Of course, as the guy tells it, there’d be a lot more money every concert to go to the cause if Hannity didn’t demand–and get–use of a Gulfstream 5 plane to fly him and his family/entourage to the concerts; a “fleet” (that’s the word the guy used) of either Cadillac or Lincoln SUVs for him and his family/entourage; and several suites at really expensive hotels for him and his family/entourage. The promoter apparently values Hannity’s star demands at well over $200,000 per event. The source says he heard that Oliver North pulled Hannity aside at one of the concerts and told him that this had to stop. But that may mean that, from now on, Hannity has to fly on a G4 instead of a G5, gets only a few luxury SUVs, and two or three suites.

The post gets worse. If true, this would end Sean Hannity's career. The folks who listen to Talk Radio will tolerate a lot from the hosts. Rush Limbaugh's drug addiction is a good example. Willful deception at the expense of our troops and their families would not be tolerated by anyone.

Freedom Alliance's response is here. Debbie Schlussel is right. It's weak, and hopefully will just be the opening salvo in it's defense.

Hugh Hewitt: One of the Best Sources For Conservative Activists

I've listened to Hugh Hewitt for years. He is not on radio here in Oklahoma, but thanks to the internet, all radio is local. A law professor and radio host, he was the first to see blogging as more than a passing fad, and still one of the best sources of info and conservative activism around.

Democrats Need to Watch This...

...especially Nancy Pelosi, as it is about to happen again.
Dick Gephardt showed grace and class. Pelosi has neither.
If they think we will forget this weekend, then they are bigger fools than they appear.

Thursday, March 18, 2010

The Breach

As I watch the Democrats continue their unending death march, I keep seeing similarities to the Republicans who continued to go after Clinton even when the polls were against them. The Breach is one of the best looks at both sides of the Impeachment fiasco. History has a tendency to repeat itself until we learn its lessons.

A Dose of Truth from a Real American Heroine

Ingrid Martin didn't have to say anything. She could have kept her mouth shut. Thank God she didn't. She took on the President, and "spoke truth to power." Isn't that the phrase the liberals used back in the sixties? 
I crossed my hand and bit my lips a couple of time, and when he made his Medicare claim I said ‘no, no, no,’ ” she told me yesterday.
“ ‘Yes, sir, I’m fine,’ I told him. ‘I just don’t support your bill,’ ” she said. “And at that point, security and everyone stopped.”While she kept her reactions more in line with Justice Sam Alito’s, the president must have noticed. As he shook hands after the speech, he asked her, “Are you OK?”
And so it came to pass that, for two minutes, Obama and an informed citizen who doesn’t support his plan shared some straight talk. Well, Martin talked straight, anyway.
“He asked me what I would do, and I said the problem is that he’s doing insurance reform, but the problem is really the cost of medical care itself. I said we should fix things that are driving costs up, like defensive medicine and the need for tort reform,” she said. “He told me the bill handled all that, and I said ‘Well, I don’t believe it.’ ”
Ingrid Martin, of Brunswick, Ohio, called out the president of the United States. And at his own pep rally, to boot. “Oh my gosh, I’m calling the president a liar,” she said afterward.
About time someone did. 

The Corner - National Review Online

This represents 3 strikes: Arrogant. Ignorant. Incompetent. That fits the unHoly Trinity of Obama, Pelosi and Reid.


During a press conference held by eleven Congressional GOP doctors today, Rep. Paul Broun (R., Ga.) had harsh words for Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.)

“I have three simple questions Ms Pelosi,” said Rep. Paul Broun, R-Ga. “Are you so arrogant that you think you know what’s best for the American people? Are you so ignorant that you are oblivious to the wishes of the American people? And are you so incompetent that you are going to ignore the Constitution of the United States, use tricks, deceptions, bald faced lies to try to ram down the throat of the American people something that they do not want and is going to be absolutely worse for their healthcare?”



The Corner - National Review Online

Wednesday, March 17, 2010

Blogger Templates

This template is called The Morning After. I really like it. Note to self: I know just enough HTML and CSS to really screw this blog up good. ALWAYS back up before changing the HTML. Sigh.

Can the Republicans Take Barbara Boxer's Senate Seat?

That question would have been a resounding NO a few months back. Now?
Tom Campbell is within 4 points. The Democrat Death March continues...

QUESTION: If the election for U.S. Senate were held today, for whom would you vote for if the choices were between Barbara Boxer, the Democrat, and Tom Campbell, the Republican?

 BARBARA BOXERTOM CAMPBELLUNDECIDED
ALL474310
MEN42499
WOMEN523711
DEMOCRATS80119
REPUBLICANS7858
INDEPENDENTS434512
WHITE41518
HISPANIC602911
BLACK75718
ASIAN474013
18-29513811
30-44494011
45-5948466
60+384814
NORTHERN434512
CENTRAL39556
LA COUNTY582814
BAY632413
SOUTHERN35578                                                                         

We the People

Ray Stevens has put my feelings to music. I suspect he's speaking for a lot of people with this song.

The Dem Death March: A Little History from The Daily Beast

This, from Peter Beinart, explains alot. Worth reading twice.

Blogging has come a long way...

I stopped blogging a couple of years ago. Stopped using Blogger before that. Coming back is getting easier all the time. Google has added so many new features and upgrades, like this one. I'm blogging from my IPhone to two blogs, and could include Facebook and Twitter if I wanted. How cool is that?


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone

Location:Meadowbrook Ln,Prague,United States

Tuesday, March 16, 2010

I Think Obama meant this as a bad thng but...

considering his poll numbers, Dems who vote against the unhealth bill may be thankful come November that the big O is not going to "help" them.

Coming Home

Liberty Just in Case began as a way for me to express my feelings about 9/11, and how my world changed because of it. With Matt's help, I took it to a whole new level, then lost interest. Now, I find a need to bring it back. I've returned to the original design, and it feels good, like coming home.

Sunday, February 12, 2006

Liberty Just in Case HAS Moved

Liberty Just in Case HAS moved. Matt and I have been talking about the future of LJIC for awhile, and we both felt it was time to move to our own dot com. It gives us much more freedom to expand the blogsite, and to do more with video and other media. Also, it allows folks to quickly type our URL, without the cumbersome "blogspot" in the middle.

I know that alot of folks have very bad feelings about Blogger. I don't share them. I've enjoyed the ease of use, and the fact that Blogger is FREE. It's been home for over five years, but now it's time to move on.

Matt and I are already posting on the new site, even though there's still a bit of dust on the floor, and we are still in the process of redecorating. So, head on over to:

http://libertyjustincase.com

Tuesday, February 07, 2006

The WMD Question Isn't Closed

Great post from Captain's Quarters on Saddam's missing WMD. If found, this would be a huge blow to the Defeatocrats and their willing allies in the MSM.

And, Just So the Junior Senator From Illinois Doesn't Feel Left Out..

Just when I've decided I can start hating John McCain again, he goes and does something so wonderful I just may have to vote for him. This letter, written to Senator Osama Obama as Senator Teddy called him, is the height of subtle nastiness. (HT to Austin Bay):
Washington D.C. ­– Today, Senator McCain sent the following letter to Senator Obama regarding ongoing Congressional efforts towards bipartisan lobbying reform. The following is the text from that letter:

February 6, 2006

The Honorable Barack Obama

United States Senate

SH-713

Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator Obama:

I would like to apologize to you for assuming that your private assurances to me regarding your desire to cooperate in our efforts to negotiate bipartisan lobbying reform legislation were sincere. When you approached me and insisted that despite your leadership’s preference to use the issue to gain a political advantage in the 2006 elections, you were personally committed to achieving a result that would reflect credit on the entire Senate and offer the country a better example of political leadership, I concluded your professed concern for the institution and the public interest was genuine and admirable. Thank you for disabusing me of such notions with your letter to me dated February 2, 2006, which explained your decision to withdraw from our bipartisan discussions. I’m embarrassed to admit that after all these years in politics I failed to interpret your previous assurances as typical rhetorical gloss routinely used in politics to make self-interested partisan posturing appear more noble. Again, sorry for the confusion, but please be assured I won’t make the same mistake again.

As you know, the Majority Leader has asked Chairman Collins to hold hearings and mark up a bill for floor consideration in early March. I fully support such timely action and I am confident that, together with Senator Lieberman, the Committee on Governmental Affairs will report out a meaningful, bipartisan bill.

You commented in your letter about my “interest in creating a task force to further study” this issue, as if to suggest I support delaying the consideration of much-needed reforms rather than allowing the committees of jurisdiction to hold hearings on the matter. Nothing could be further from the truth. The timely findings of a bipartisan working group could be very helpful to the committee in formulating legislation that will be reported to the full Senate. Since you are new to the Senate, you may not be aware of the fact that I have always supported fully the regular committee and legislative process in the Senate, and routinely urge Committee Chairmen to hold hearings on important issues. In fact, I urged Senator Collins to schedule a hearing upon the Senate’s return in January.

Furthermore, I have consistently maintained that any lobbying reform proposal be bipartisan. The bill Senators Joe Lieberman and Bill Nelson and I have introduced is evidence of that commitment as is my insistence that members of both parties be included in meetings to develop the legislation that will ultimately be considered on the Senate floor. As I explained in a recent letter to Senator Reid, and have publicly said many times, the American people do not see this as just a Republican problem or just a Democratic problem. They see it as yet another run-of-the-mill Washington scandal, and they expect it will generate just another round of partisan gamesmanship and posturing. Senator Lieberman and I, and many other members of this body, hope to exceed the public’s low expectations. We view this as an opportunity to bring transparency and accountability to the Congress, and, most importantly, to show the public that both parties will work together to address our failings.

As I noted, I initially believed you shared that goal. But I understand how important the opportunity to lead your party’s effort to exploit this issue must seem to a freshman Senator, and I hold no hard feelings over your earlier disingenuousness. Again, I have been around long enough to appreciate that in politics the public interest isn’t always a priority for every one of us. Good luck to you, Senator.

Sincerely,

John McCain

United States Senate

I've seldom read a better, more subtle slap-down.

Meet The New Media, Senator Dick

The video wasn't rolling when Paul Mirengoff of Powerline spoke to Senator Teddy, but the camera caught Senator Dick's introduction to the New Media. As the General said in a famous episode of MASH, "This is a press conference! The last thing I want is to answer a bunch of damn fool questions!"

Sorry Senator Dick, there's a new Media in town...

Sunday, February 05, 2006

The Idiocy of Extremism:Part II

Event are spiraling out of control. Tony Blankely called it first. The past few days are looking amazingly like his prologue...

Saturday, February 04, 2006

Finally, a Nazi Reference That Actually Fits

From the new German Chancellor:

MUNICH, Germany (Reuters) - German Chancellor Angela Merkel likened Iran's nuclear plans on Saturday to the threat posed by the Nazis in their early days, as top U.S. officials urged a tough line to stop Tehran from making an atomic bomb.

U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld accused the Islamic republic of being the world's leading sponsor of terrorism, a charge his Iranian counterpart rejected as "ridiculous" and "outrageous".

Addressing the annual Munich security conference, Merkel said countries around the world had underestimated the Nazi threat as Adolf Hitler rose to power.

"Looking back to German history in the early 1930s when National Socialism (Nazism) was on the rise, there were many outside Germany who said 'It's only rhetoric -- don't get excited'," she told the assembled world defense policy makers.

"There were times when people could have reacted differently and, in my view, Germany is obliged to do something at the early stages ... We want to, we must prevent Iran from developing its nuclear program."

It's so nice to have an ally in Germany again.


The 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review

The first paragraphs of the QDR:
The United States is a nation engaged in what will be a long war.

Since the attacks of September 11, 2001, our Nation has fought a global war against violent extremists who use terrorism as their weapon of choice, and who seek to destroy our free way of life. Our enemies seek weapons of mass destruction and, if they are successful, will likely attempt to use them in their conflict with free people everywhere. Currently, the struggle is centered in Iraq and Afghanistan, but we will need to be prepared and arranged to successfully defend our Nation and its interests around the globe for years to come. This 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review is submitted in the fifth year of this long war.
This is an important document. Look over it, and don't let the MSM summarize it for you. We live in an age where documents like this are readily available to us all. Take advantage of that access.

And, from an August 2005 report, something the QDR does not address well, China's push in to space.

Prayers For the Assassin

Prayers for the Assassin : A NovelPrayers for the Assassin : A Novel by Robert Ferrigni was a great read. Set in the year 2040, in a time when The United States has split into the Islamic States of America and the Christian States of America. It's fast pace and excellent character development soon make you believe it could happen. The accompanying website to the book give more info on the book, and some interesting background on the setting. Worth picking up, or you can order it here by clicking on the link. It'll be under Liberty Recommends all month. Check it out!

Friday, February 03, 2006

Required Reading: Ideology Matters

When the history of the 2006 elections is written, this editorial by Daniel Henninger will be cited many times over. (HT to RL for this one)

Thursday, February 02, 2006

A Reply to the Left: Different Worlds

Gayle, I'm not trying to pick on you with this post. I don't know you, but do very much appreciate your dropping by Liberty Just in Case. Your comment was well-written, respectful, and presented your thoughts very well. I'm using your comment as an example of the kinds of comments we've recieved frequently over the past weeks. Any generalizations that don't fit you are sincerely unintended.

Gayle's comment to my post yesterday was well written, sincere, and an excellent example of the thinking of those from the Left side of the aisle. All through her comment, she makes the usual accusations: Bush lied, there isn't much progress in Iraq, the U.S. military is engaging in systematic torture, and she even managed to throw Haliburton in there, though not by name. She even starts by agreeing that we must have victory, yet accuses the military of "attrocities."
If this comment had been written 2 years ago, or even 6 months ago, I would have gone through a lengthy defense, answering each charge separately, citing source after source to back up my arguments. But there is simply so much information countering each and every accusation that its not worth the effort. It's highly unlikely that Gayle will read any of it. If she does, it will be through her ready made filters of "Bush lied, people died." I'm simply tired of refighting the same battles again and again. There comes a point when we must move on to the future, instead of fighting hopeless rearguard actions against folks who will never be persuaded they are wrong.

It seems we live in different worlds, with closed information loops. The fact that Gayle, and those like her, visit a site like Liberty Just in Case is encouraging. It shows they are willing to get out of their own loops, and at least engage with folks like me and Matt, who support both the Iraqi front, and the wider war on Islamo Fascism. But to go back and refight why we got in to Iraq again and again doesn't help win the war. I simply won't do it anymore.

Closed Information Loops produce different worldviews. Lest I be accused of hypocrisy, let me make it clear that I've read widely from those who disagree with me. I can give a list of those books as well, if needed. From Richard Clarke and Bob Graham, right up to the current book by James Risen, I've read them all. Most recycle through pages and pages the arguments and accusations Gayle put in a few paragraphs. Each has been answered, or, in the case of the Risen book, is in the process of being answered. My experience is that those on the Left seldom read those answers. They prefer to stay trapped in their worldview.

If you are interested, two of the best books that do answer the comments from the Left are listed under Liberty Recommends to the right. Disinformation, by Richard Miniter, takes the accusations that Gayle made in her comment and analyzes each one, from the claims of 100,000 civilian deaths in Iraq, to Haliburton. I would strongly recommend it, before making the kinds of unfounded accusations that filled Gayle's comment. I would also recommend Imperial Grunts, by Robert Kaplan. The first in a series of books on the U.S. military in this war, he focuses on Special Forces and the Marine Corps. He does NOT focus on Iraq, but on the wider war in which we are engaged.

Also on the reading list would be The Connection, by Stephen Hayes. He details the links between Saddam and terrorism, up to and including links to Mohammed Atta. His frequent columns in The Weekly Standard continue the work begun with the release of The Connection. Here is one of those, on Saddam's terrorist training camps.

There are many others that answer the questions posed by the Left far better than I can. But like the old saying goes, You can lead a horse to water...

Consider yourself led. The drinking is up to you.

Goodbye, Margene...For Now

I don't often post personal items here. Liberty Just in Case is a political blog, after all. But the world lost a great woman yesterday, and that loss deserves mention.

I first met Margene in graduate school at Wheaton College. We were both pursuing our Master's Degree in Clinical Psychology. She and her husband Tom had come home from missionary work in Greece due to Margene's ongoing illness. That was 1992. Even then, Margene knew she was dying, knew it in that deep place of certainty.

In that first year of Grad school, we were in group therapy together, and her illness was a frequent topic. I could not understand why she wasn't angry, why she never showed anything but a deep, abiding peace in the midst of her great suffering. The more at peace she was, the more angry I became. It was not until years later that I came to understand her deep, living faith in Jesus Christ. Even now, fifteen years later, I don't fully understand how she could have had such peace. But she did. One thing that you cannot do in group therapy is hide your true feelings. Margene never tried to hide her suffering, but she never once used it as an excuse to whine either.

Over the years, Margene became a stabilizing force for my wife and I. She made a recieving blanket for our daughter when she was born in 1993, and another one for our son in 1995. Both still view those blankets as prized possessions, and sleep with them every night. Margene's daughter would often babysit for us. We hope and pray our daughter can grow up to be the shining light that Margene's daughter was and is.

Margene and Tom moved to Colorado a few years ago. By that time, Margene had a transplant of multiple organs, all at once. Despite complications, these transplants gave her a few more years of service. Service was Margene's life. She served others as naturally as breathing, as openly and without regard to self as walking. Toward the end, breathing and walking did not come naturally to Margene. But service did, right up to the end.

I've known many Christians over the years. But I've never met a person who so embodied the spirit of Servanthood as Margene. I will miss her. But there is no doubt in my mind or heart that I will see her again, fully restored to health. In the words of Paul from 1 Thessalonians Ch. 4:
13Brothers, we do not want you to be ignorant about those who fall asleep, or to grieve like the rest of men, who have no hope. 14We believe that Jesus died and rose again and so we believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in him. 15According to the Lord's own word, we tell you that we who are still alive, who are left till the coming of the Lord, will certainly not precede those who have fallen asleep. 16For the Lord himself will come down from heaven, with a loud command, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet call of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. 17After that, we who are still alive and are left will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And so we will be with the Lord forever. 18Therefore encourage each other with these words.
Margene was a constant encouragement to all who knew her. She remains so, even though she has "fallen asleep." When that trumpet sounds, one of the first people I'll be looking for is my friend Margene.

Wednesday, February 01, 2006

Bravo to the Joint Chiefs!

A disgusting cartoon. Thanks to the Joint Chiefs for protesting it so strongly.

The State of the Union-Good; The State of the Democrat Party-Not So Much

There's a great line from one of the Die Hard Movies, "I don't like you because you're gonna get me killed!" My attitude toward the Defeatocrat party in a nutshell. They were in full flower last night, far more enthusiastic about defeating Social Security reform than fighting terrorists, and refusing to give up obstructionism as their primary, indeed only, philosophy of government.

But this philosophy of obstruction will get me killed, and hundreds of thousands of other Americans along with me. I have only to look back at 9/11 to see the consequences of the Defeatocrat philosophy. And I have only to look at Flight 93 to see the first heroes of World War IV.

One of the Defeatocrat leaders, Mother Sheehan, was led out before the State of the Union, as the base of the Defeatocrat Party stood outside, banging pots and pans. They were desperately seeking to drown out how desperately out of touch they are from the rest of America. But truth is hard to shout down, and no amount of leftist whining will change that.

One thing the Left has managed to do is take our eyes off the war we are engaged in. When they say they are protesting "the war," they mean Iraq. Yet the War is far more than one front, and the Iraqi front, while important, is but one front in a greater war against Islamo-Fascism. It's as though they were protesting our invasion of North Africa in WWII because Hitler didn't directly attack us at Pearl Harbor. How foolish. How obstructionist. How dangerous should the Defeatocrats regain power.

Some of my best friends are from the left side of the aisle. They are great people, well meaning and sincere. But, when it comes to the security of this nation, "I don't like you because you're gonna get me killed!" And, after four years of war, my patience with their continued obstructionism has worn thin. The time for argument and debate is past. War has come, and the only way to peace is through victory over the terrorists who threaten us, in Iraq, in Iran, and through out the globe. Victory is not assured until this nation commits to total war, as we did in The Great War, and again in WWII. The President once again issued that call to total war and total victory last night. And the Defeatocrats banged their pots and pans...

Tuesday, January 31, 2006

Objective Journalism, CNN Style

Required Reading: Debra Burlingame

One of the most powerful editorials I've ever read, from a 9/11 family member. Here's the final paragraphs:

We now have the ability to put remote control cameras on the surface of Mars.Why should we allow enemies to annihilate us simply because we lack the clarity or resolve to strike a reasonable balance between a healthy skepticism of government power and the need to take proactive measures to protect ourselves from such threats? The mantra of civil-liberties hard-liners is to "question authority"--even when it is coming to our rescue--then blame that same authority when, hamstrung by civil liberties laws, it fails to save us. The old laws that would prevent FBI agents from stopping the next al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi were built on the bedrock of a 35-year history of dark, defeating mistrust. More Americans should not die because the peace-at-any-cost fringe and antigovernment paranoids still fighting the ghost of Nixon hate George Bush more than they fear al Qaeda. Ask the American people what they want. They will say that they want the commander in chief to use all reasonable means to catch the people who are trying to rain terror on our cities. Those who cite the soaring principle of individual liberty do not appear to appreciate that our enemies are not seeking to destroy individuals, but whole populations.

Three weeks before 9/11, an FBI agent with the bin Laden case squad in New York learned that al-Mihdhar and al-Hazmi were in this country. He pleaded with the national security gatekeepers in Washington to launch a nationwide manhunt and was summarily told to stand down. When the FISA Court of Review tore down the wall in 2002, it included in its ruling the agent's Aug. 29, 2001, email to FBI headquarters: "Whatever has happened to this--someday someone will die--and wall or not--the public will not understand why we were not more effective and throwing every resource we had at certain problems. Let's hope the National Security Law Unit will stand behind their decisions then, especially since the biggest threat to us now, [bin Laden], is getting the most 'protection.'"

The public has listened to years of stinging revelations detailing how the government tied its own hands in stopping the devastating attacks of September 11. It is an irresponsible violation of the public trust for members of Congress to weaken the Patriot Act or jeopardize the NSA terrorist surveillance program because of the same illusory theories that cost us so dearly before, or worse, for rank partisan advantage. If they do, and our country sustains yet another catastrophic attack that these antiterrorism tools could have prevented, the phrase "connect the dots" will resonate again--but this time it will refer to the trail of innocent American blood which leads directly to the Senate floor.


A powerful peice, from a steady voice in the midst of all the hysteria.

Dennis Prager on Hamas, the Palestinians, and the Left

Prager speaks clearly to the election of terrorists by Palestinians:

So the Palestinian vote reveals the falsity of the worldwide Left's view of the Palestinians as committed to peace. It likewise reveals the falsity of the Left's belief that Palestinian terror is supported by a small minority of the Palestinian population.
That is one reason why the Bush doctrine -- we need to spread democracy everywhere possible, including, or even especially, in the Arab world -- is so valid. You cannot deal with any problem in life -- from the most personal to the most macro -- by engaging in wishful thinking and denying reality. Thanks to this election, the mask has been removed. When given the opportunity to express themselves, most Arabs and many Muslims elsewhere support terror and seek the annihilation of Israel. That is why the Hamas victory is such a defeat for the world's Left -- university professors, news media, socialist parties, the European Union, the United Nations, "peace" activists, editorial writers, and all other apologists for the Palestinians.


An excellent piece, sure to make my friends on the Left cringe. Think about what he says before you comment. Let the emotion pass, and think. Then comment if you'd like.

Monday, January 30, 2006

Flight 93: Another Movie

Good review of the A&E version of Flight 93, premiering tonight. We need to remember what those passengers did, and what our soldiers are still doing to fight Islamo-Fascism.

Saturday, January 28, 2006

Winning

How is it that the Left has come to a place where good news from Iraq is bad news for them? Sad. Very Sad. (HT to Instapundit for the link.)

Commiserating With a Friend

A great friend of Liberty Just in Case lost a huge contract yesterday. Craig, we're grieving right along with you. Don't hesitate to let Matt or I know if we can do anything for you. As always, you will be in our prayers.

Go For Throttle Up: Twenty Years Ago

Shuttle flights became "routine" in the 80's, and school kids stopped watching. But, with the first teacher in space planning to do lessons from Earth orbit, the televisions were rolled in to the classrooms across the country. And we all saw it, live and in color.

This was the beginning of the end for NASA, though even now that huge bureaucracy hasn't realized it even now. Manned space travel will become routine again, but only when private enterprise is given free reign to do the exploring. The money now going to keep the technology of the '70's going should be reinvested to the 21st century private space enterprises cropping up all over the country. This would be the most fitting memorial to the brave men and women of Challenger.

A note about the photo: This frame captures the moment the O-Ring failed. The first gouts of flame are clearly visible just above the main engine exhaust. Fractions of a second later, it was over, and they were gone.

Thursday, January 26, 2006

The NSA Surveillance: Justice Department White Paper

I've been looking for this. It's the 45 page document from the Department of Justice outlining their case for the continuing surveillance. Interesting that the Defeatocrats have changed their tune slightly since this came out.

Religious Discrimination at The University of Wisconsin

Great catch from Chad at 4 The Little Guy. Free speech only exists if you agree with the radical leftist agenda of today's college campuses.

WMD Moved to Syria? We've Heard This Before

We'll see. Another guy trying to sell a book. Sorry, but I've got way too many to read right now as it is....

More on the Canadian Election

HT to Canuckistan Chronicles for this analysis of the changes in Canada. Far deeper than anything I've found in the MSM here in the States. Good stuff!

Leave It To The Palestinians...

...to shoot themselves, and the peace process, in the foot. It has been the history of the Palestinians, whenever peace is close, to do something to stop it. From Munich to Camp David, history is littered with the failure of the Palestinians to grasp peace with Israel.

The latest chapter, with the terrorist organization Hamas winning a majority of seats in the Palestinian parliament may be the last, and worst, bullet the Palestinians can shoot at themselves. Hamas has not changed, or recanted their charter, the Martyr's oath:
"Our struggle against the Jews is very great and very serious...The Movement is but one squadron that should be supported by more and more squadrons from this vast Arab and Islamic world, until the enemy is vanquished and Allah's victory is realised...
That's the beginning. Here's the final paragraph:
Israel, Judaism and Jews challenge Islam and the Muslim people. 'May the cowards never sleep.'"
I'm having some trouble seeing these folks as "partners in peace." It's time we realized that the Palestinians have never wanted peace. They want victory. Hamas has offered to give them that victory, and the Martyr's Oath of Hamas spells out the terms of that victory, the total destruction not just of Israel, but of Judaism. At least Hamas is honest about its goals, at least for now. Their honesty may change as they gain political power. The goals won't. But the honesty may fade as they seek to consolidate their gains before launching their next attack on Israel, and it's ally, The United States.

Wednesday, January 25, 2006

An Honest Liberal Speaks: Hugh Hewitt

Great interview with the author of Warrior and Wusses including the audio. What a jerk. No other word for it. The ignorance of this columnist is just staggering, and Hugh Hewitt brings out this ignorance without Mr. Stein even realizing he looks like...well...a jerk.

The First "Earthlike" Planet

Well, sort of. Only five times the size of Earth, its the smallest planet detected. Not exactly a vacation spot, but it give us some evidence of other rocky worlds orbiting distant suns. It's only a matter of time until we find one like ours.

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

NSA Surveillance: It's Legal, It's Moral, and It Will Continue

I've not spent much time on the whole NSA issue. I think it's just one more time bomb that will eventually blow up in the Left's face. But this post from Powerline spells out the program, and the MSM's blatant ignorance. Like Senator Herb Kohl (D-WI) the MSM needs to look up from the DNC talking points occasionally.

Joel Stein: An Honest Liberal at Last

Joel Stein admits the illogic of saying you support the troops but don't support what they are doing. It's about time a liberal told the truth. I'm not expecting this truth telling to start a trend on the left however...

How to Become a Liberal in 22 Steps

The list is great, and the huffing and puffing of the comments is almost as funny as the post itself. Very good stuff!

Oh Canada! In a Squeaker.

Wonder Woman and Richard have the details.
Mark Steyn has a great look at the new Prime Minister.
And The Vancouver Sun breaks down the vote by region.
I'll be humming "Oh Canada!" all day. It's much easier to sing than "The Star Spangled Banner, " especially after last night.

Monday, January 23, 2006

A Great Post From Canada

It will be great to have an ally to our north again. Looks like the Liberals are on their way out in Canada. Germany, Canada, the U.S. Just keeps getting better and better.

The Evolution of Math

I don't post stuff I recieve in email very often, but this one is definitely an exception. Thanks to Sue for this one:
Last week I purchased a burger at Burger King for $1.58. The countergirl took my $2 and I was digging for my change when I pulled 8 cents from my pocket and gave it to her. She stood there, holding the nickel and 3 pennies, while looking at the screen on her register. I sensed her discomfort and tried to tell her to just give me two quarters, but she hailed the manager for help. While he tried to explain the transaction to her, she stood there and cried. Why do I tell you this?

Because of the evolution in teaching math since the 1950s:

1.Teaching Math In 1950
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price. What is his profit?

2.Teaching Math In 1960
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price, or $80. What is his profit?

3.Teaching Math In 1970
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is $80. Did he make a profit?

4.Teaching Math In 1980
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is $80 and his profit is $20. Your assignment: Underline the number 20.

5.Teaching Math In 1990
A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish and inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habitat of animals or the preservation of our woodlands. He does this so he can make a profit of $20. What do you think of this way of making a living?
Topic for class participation after answering the question: How did the birds and squirrels feel as the logger cut down their homes? There are no wrong answers.

6.Teaching Math In 2005
Un hachero vende una carretada de maderapara $100. El costo de la producciones es $80.
Sigh.

Learning From History: The Great Influenza

The Great Influenza (revised ed) : The Epic Story of the Deadliest Plague in HistoryThe Great Influenza (revised ed) : The Epic Story of the Deadliest Plague in History
Few books have captured the horror and the heroism of 1918 as has this one. The horror of hundreds of thousands of deaths, touching every family in the United States. The heroism of the doctors and nurses who fought, and often died, of the same influenza.

And, as the death toll climbs from the latest flu outbreak, it's vital we look back to the last great pandemic, learning the lessons of their heroism and horror.

33 Years Ago: Roe v. Wade

The dissenting opinion of Justice White:

"I find nothing in the language or history of the Constitution to support the Court's judgment. The Court simply fashions and announces a new constitutional right for pregnant mothers and, with scarcely any reason or authority for its action, invests that right with sufficient substance to override most existing state abortion statutes. The upshot is that the people and the legislatures of the 50 States are constitutionally disentitled to weigh the relative importance of the continued existence and development of the fetus, on the one hand, against a spectrum of possible impacts on the mother, on the other hand. As an exercise of raw judicial power, the Court perhaps has authority to do what it does today; but, in my view, its judgment is an improvident and extravagant exercise of the power of judicial review that the Constitution extends to this Court.

"The Court apparently values the convenience of the pregnant mother more than the continued existence and development of the life or potential life that she carries. Whether or not I might agree with that marshaling of values, I can in no event join the Court's judgment because I find no constitutional warrant for imposing such an order of priorities on the people and legislatures of the States. In a sensitive area such as this, involving as it does issues over which reasonable men may easily and heatedly differ, I cannot accept the Court's exercise of its clear power of choice by interposing a constitutional barrier to state efforts to protect human life and by investing mothers and doctors with the constitutionally protected right to exterminate it. This issue, for the most part, should be left with the people and to the political processes the people have devised to govern their affairs." (coutesy Wikipedia)

Today, in the home state of Tom Daschle, the legislature of South Dakota is taking the first steps to reverse Roe. It's too late for millions of unborn, but it's a beginning.

Saturday, January 21, 2006

Canadian Soldiers Head for Afghanistan

Great post from Wonder Woman over at North American Patriot. Worth a mention, and a thank you to these brave soldiers helping the U.S. and the Afghans secure freedom.

Friday, January 20, 2006

Wish I'd Seen This: A Positive Portrayal of an Evangelical on Scrubs

Great read. I may have start watching the show now.

End of the Spear Opens Today


If you grew up Evangelical Christian as I did, you likely knew the name of Jim and Elisabeth Elliot before you knew the name of the President. The story of the five missionaries who died, and their wives and children bringing the Gospel to the very tribe that murdered them was told and retold through out my childhood.

End of the Spear tells that story from the point of view of the tribesmen themselves. It's the latest in a series of independent movies marketed to the growing number of us tired of the "Brokeback Mountain" and " Hostel" garbage coming from Hollyweird. End of the Spear is playing on 1200 screens beginning 1/20/05.

Thursday, January 19, 2006

The Last of the Nine: New Horizons


I've been waiting for New Horizons to launch for three days now. We will finally get a look at the either the last planet, or the first resident of the Kuiper Belt, depending on how you look at it. Either way, we're going to have some fantastic pictures in a few years.

The Origins of the Great War: 2007

An analysis of the origins of the Great War, also known as World War IV (2007-2011) and the ways history repeats itself. Required reading, folks. Hat Tip to NeoCon Express, a must read site.

Bin Laden Speaks...From the Dead?

Now here's an interesting quote from the new Bin Laden tape:
"The delay in similar operations happening in America has not been because of failure to break through your security measures. But the operations are happening in Baghdad and you will see them here at home the minute they are through (with preparations), with God's permission," he said.
What's interesting is his confirmation that the terrorists are very much tied down in Iraq, something the Left has gone to great pains to deny.

When the tape was actually made is still being determined. But the threat is very real.

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Are You a Heretic?

A fun quiz, but with an important message. Christianity was defined in the first four centuries of its existence by the heresies it faced. This quiz helps sort out those historical heresies from the truth as defined by the great Councils of the Church, especially the great councils of Nicea and Chalcedon. HT to RSP for this one.


You scored as Chalcedon compliant. You are Chalcedon compliant. Congratulations, you're not a heretic. You believe that Jesus is truly God and truly man and like us in every respect, apart from sin. Officially approved in 451.

Chalcedon compliant


92%

Modalism


58%

Monophysitism


58%

Monarchianism


58%

Nestorianism


50%

Apollanarian


33%

Adoptionist


33%

Pelagianism


25%

Gnosticism


8%

Socinianism


8%

Albigensianism


0%

Arianism


0%

Docetism


0%

Donatism


0%

Are you a heretic?
created with QuizFarm.com

Update: If you'd like to know what all these are, and what heresy you may have mixed in, go here.

So, Yesterday Was MLK Day...

and Matt posted one of the most moving, most poetic speeches in our nation's history. The impact of Martin Luther King's "I Have a Dream" oratory continues to resonate through our national conciousness.

So, what did the Defeatocrats say in memorial to this great Christian leader?

A current U.S. Senator, and future Presidential candidate, spoke of "plantations," disgracefully playing the race card in hopes of getting elected to the Presidency on 2008. She said this at the annual "Al Sharpton Homage Dinner," a requirement of all Defeatocrats running for office in New York. I wonder if Tawana Brawley was invited?

A former U.S. Senator, former Presidential candidate with aspirations to run again, proclaims the current President a criminal, and calls for hearings. Just a few words here:
Budhist Temple. Ruby Ridge. Waco. Elian Gonzalez. Aldrich Ames. Perjury. Cigars. Impeachment.

And the erstwhile Mayor of New Orleans gives some interesting culinary suggestions for bringing back his flood ravaged city:
"It's time for us to come together. It's time for us to rebuild New Orleans _ the one that should be a chocolate New Orleans," the mayor said. "This city will be a majority African American city. It's the way God wants it to be. You can't have New Orleans no other way. It wouldn't be New Orleans."
Mayor Nagin also gives his reasons for believing Katrina, and other hurricanes hit.

Mayor Ray Nagin suggested Monday that Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and other storms were a sign that "God is mad at America" and at black communities, too, for tearing themselves apart with violence and political infighting.

"Surely God is mad at America. He sent us hurricane after hurricane after hurricane, and it's destroyed and put stress on this country," Nagin, who is black, said as he and other city leaders marked Martin Luther King Day.

"Surely he doesn't approve of us being in Iraq under false pretenses. But surely he is upset at black America also. We're not taking care of ourselves."

Can you picture the reaction of Pat Robertson saying such a thing?

Another great Federally-mandated holiday to race bait, whine and complain for the Left. Martin Luther King would be appalled, and rightfully so.

Saturday, January 14, 2006

Freedom of Religion...NOT!

Great post from Chad over at 4 The Little Guy. Didn't realize freedom of religion ended when one took public office.

Mark will be away for a while

I'm off for a 3 day family vacation in Galena IL, home of one of our greatest Generals, and worst Presidents. But one of the great things about having a partner is that Liberty Just in Case will just keep purring along. And, by the way, I think I liked Matt's results better than my own on the Superhero test. Sigh.
Your results:
You are Green Lantern
Green Lantern
60%
Supergirl
45%
Superman
45%
Batman
40%
Spider-Man
35%
Hulk
35%
Iron Man
30%
Wonder Woman
25%
Robin
22%
The Flash
15%
Catwoman
10%
Hot-headed. You have strong
will power and a good imagination.
Click here to take the Superhero Personality Quiz

Thursday, January 12, 2006

Columns Like This Were What Made Me a Blogger: Peggy Noonan

Noone can put words together and say just what I'm thinking like Peggy Noonan. Great, great look at the Alito hearings, in a way only she can accomplish.

Blogosphere Politics: Michael Barone

A must read column. An important analysis of what the blogosphere has wrought on politics, both left and right.

The Defeatocrats Score a Victim

HT to The Corner for this one. I hope Senator dick, Leahy, Kennedy et al are feeling proud tonight. They've browbeat a good man, and made his wife cry. Nice work, don't you think?

And, Lindsay Graham is off the RINO list after his wonderful performance in these hearings. Of course, if he hangs out with John McCain for awhile, he will quickly find his way right back on the list.

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

1918 Here We Come

(HT Hugh Hewitt)
Looks like the bird flu is mutating, becoming more deadly each time...

Catch and Release: Michael Yon


When you see the picture, you'll remember this hero's body being dumped on the tarmac. What you may not know is that he was tortured by the beasts in front of a microphone, hoping to get him to scream for the waiting journalists. He didn't. So they killed him. And now Germany has released the terrorist who killed him.

All of Michael Yon's posts are important. This one may be his most important of all.

Alito Meets the Munchkins

I just can't get the image out of my head, every time I see one of the Defeatocrats ask Alito a question in these hearings. Now, I have to admit, I've been massively bored with the whole thing this time around. So far, no Defeatocrat has come close to asking a coherent question, though Illinois' private shame, Senator Dick, tried very hard.

It'll be good to see Judge Alito join Judge Roberts on the court in a few weeks.

More Media Myths: Mine Safety

Have you heard the media mantra yet? It goes something like this:
Those poor miners wouldn't have died if Bush had done his job! This is Bush's fault!

Um, wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

Read the whole peice from TCS, unless you want to keep believing lies and myths, of course.

Media Myths: Military Recruiting

See! See! NOONE supports the illegal, immoral war on the innocent in Iraq! The evil U.S. military isn't even able to meet their own recruiting goals!

Uh, wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

Even this heavily biased story, which seeks to downplay the whole story, can't hide the truth:
December was the seventh consecutive month that the Army met its goal.
And this:
The Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps also exceeded their monthly recruiting goals — which were all two to three times the Army's number. All four military services also met or exceeded their reenlistment goals for the month.
One more myth bites the dust. So, let's review, shall we?

The Iraqi front is part of a wider war, referred to as GWOT, or World War IV. It's legal, and authorized by Congress, including a majority of Defeatocrats. And the action in Iraq is working, and providing a base for further action on other fronts. And Iran, Syria and North Korea knows that far better than the Defeatocrats here in the United States.

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Is Bin Laden Dead?

Michael Ledeen has been right to often to ignore. We can always hope his Iranian friends are right. And speaking of Iran, the threat of war looms larger with this development.

Saturday, January 07, 2006

Saddam's Terror Camps: The Tip of the Iceberg

(HT to PajamasMedia)
Let's see. The Defeatocrats mantra is "There is no link between Saddam and Al-Qaeda." One more leftist lie that bites the dust from Saddam's own document cache. Read the whole thing, though. Looks like this is just the beginning. The main argument against releasing the documents en masse is the fear that the MSM will cherry pick them, and distort them.

But, the MSM is ALREADY DOING THAT. Should the documents be released, the blogosphere will take care of the analysis, and the distortions attempted by both left and right.

Sometimes Getting What You Want Isn't As Good as the Wanting

'Ole Ronnie's witchhunt of Tom Delay will no longer be a distraction for the GOP in the House. One more peice of evidence for the Defeatocrats' ideation, with some help from some useful idiots on the right side of the aisle.

The Defeatocrats' Continuing Suicidal Behavior

I'm becoming deeply concerned that sharp objects, belts, even shoestrings should now be removed from the Democrat Party, as they are at great risk of hurting themselves...this from Drudge is one more peice of evidence.